• Home
  • About Forum News Feed
  • About MFDF
  • How to Subscribe

Forum News Feed

Online Journal of the Mutual Fund Directors Forum

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« SEC Seeks Comments on New Short-Selling Price Test
SEC and CFTC Announce Meetings on Harmonizing Regulations »

Regulators Warn Investors About Leveraged and Inverse ETFs

August 24, 2009 by mfdf

The SEC and FINRA issued a joint release warning individual investors of the dangers of leveraged and inverse exchange traded funds (ETFs). According to the alert, these specialized and complex products, designed to achieve their stated performance on a daily basis, pose extra risk for individual investors, who tend to buy-and-hold. The thrust of the alert is that “investors should be aware that performance of these ETFs over a period longer than one day can differ significantly from their stated daily performance objectives.”

The release describes leveraged ETFs as:

Leveraged ETFs seek to deliver multiples of the performance of the index or benchmark they track. Inverse ETFs (also called “short” funds) seek to deliver the opposite of the performance of the index or benchmark they track. Like traditional ETFs, some leveraged and inverse ETFs track broad indices, some are sector-specific, and others are linked to commodities, currencies, or some other benchmark. Inverse ETFs often are marketed as a way for investors to profit from, or at least hedge their exposure to, downward moving markets.

Leveraged inverse ETFs are described as:

Leveraged inverse ETFs (also known as “ultra short” funds) seek to achieve a return that is a multiple of the inverse performance of the underlying index. An inverse ETF that tracks a particular index, for example, seeks to deliver the inverse of the performance of that index, while a 2x (two times) leveraged inverse ETF seeks to deliver double the opposite of that index’s performance. To accomplish their objectives, leveraged and inverse ETFs pursue a range of investment strategies through the use of swaps, futures contracts, and other derivative instruments.

The primary risk the alert warns of is that leveraged and inverse ETFs “are designed to achieve their stated objectives on a daily basis. Their performance over longer periods of time — over weeks or months or years — can differ significantly from the performance (or inverse of the performance) of their underlying index or benchmark during the same period of time. This effect can be magnified in volatile markets.” The release also includes some “real-life” examples of the magnified negative effects these kinds of ETFs can have for investors who make the mistake of holding them for longer periods.

As with all investments, the alert warns that the best way for investors to protect themselves is to understand thoroughly the instruments or vehicles before investing. This includes reading the prospectus, seeking the advice of a qualified investment professional who understands these products, and also understands the investor’s individual risk tolerance and investment goals. With respect to leveraged or inverse ETFs, the release advises investors to ask:

  • How does the ETF achieve its stated objectives? And what are the risks?

  • What happens if I hold longer than one trading day?
  • Is there a risk that an ETF will not meet its stated daily objective?
  • What are the costs?
  • What are the tax consequences?

The full text of the SEC and FINRA investor alert is available at: http://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/leveragedetfs-alert.htm

Advertisement

Share this:

  • Digg
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Posted in ETFs, Securities Law and Regulations | Tagged Inverse ETF, Leveraged ETF, SEC | Leave a Comment

  • Archives

    • April 2010 (10)
    • March 2010 (21)
    • February 2010 (16)
    • January 2010 (16)
    • December 2009 (15)
    • November 2009 (17)
    • October 2009 (22)
    • September 2009 (20)
    • August 2009 (17)
    • July 2009 (18)
    • June 2009 (21)
    • May 2009 (20)
    • April 2009 (22)
    • March 2009 (22)
    • February 2009 (20)
    • January 2009 (19)
    • December 2008 (20)
    • November 2008 (20)
    • October 2008 (34)
    • September 2008 (12)
  • Categories

    • Accounting and Audit (31)
    • Advisory Contracts (25)
      • Fee Litigation (19)
      • Sub-Advisers (2)
    • Disclosure (24)
      • Prospectus and SAI (11)
      • Proxy Disclosure (16)
    • Distribution (6)
      • Rule 12b-1 (2)
    • Forum News and Events (32)
    • Governance (42)
      • Board Leadership (7)
      • Compliance (16)
      • D&O Insurance (1)
      • Self-Evaluation (1)
    • Money Market Funds (28)
    • Portfolio Oversight (77)
      • Best Execution (4)
      • Complex Securities (30)
      • Custody (3)
      • ETFs (3)
      • Fixed Income Funds (1)
      • Proxy Voting (7)
      • Securities Lending (10)
      • Soft Dollars (1)
      • Valuation (17)
    • Reference (262)
      • Financial Market Legislation (91)
      • Glossaries of Fund Industry Terms (2)
      • Newer Directors (13)
      • Securities Law and Regulations (170)
    • Risk (38)
  • Pages

    • About Forum News Feed
    • About MFDF
    • How to Subscribe

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by Sadish.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Powered by WordPress.com